The Vaccine Dilemma

Key Facts:

• Not a vaccine (by any traditional definition; does not confer immunity, etc.). Rather, this is a first-ever mRNA gene therapy.
• Rushed development, still being tested, only approved under EUA (Emergency Use Authorization), no long-term study of what the genetic changes it creates do to us.
• Manufacturers are exempt from all liability for adverse effects (illness, death, etc.)

Since the beginning of this event we’ve been told there will be a vaccine, it will be the world’s first mRNA vaccine (which, by design, will modify your DNA), it will be rushed to market at Warp Speed, that the makers are legally exempt from any harm it does us, that more than one dose and yearly boosters will be required, and it will be mandatory for everyone in the whole world. Most important…

THE “COVID” INJECTION IS NOT A VACCINE BY ANY CONVENTIONAL DEFINITION. It does not create immunity, does not stop transmission, and indeed has nothing to do with the “virus” (which has not been isolated, purified, or sequenced – one must read behind the claims that it has been to understand the intentional manipulation of perception).

See the recent CHD expert panel (also on MAMM), David Martin, and examine the (un)scientific basis for the whole operation at the Immanuel Project. And if you want to go further down the rabbit hole, Corbett and Webb here discuss covid “vaccines” and ties to eugenics programs and history.

The big question, then: will you accept being a guinea pig for profiteering, prevaricating Big Pharma? Not me.

A FEW QUICK FACTS ABOUT COVID-19 “VACCINES” (with references in the links) (Credit: Sarah Smith):

• Vaccines are medical procedures that have a level of inherent risk, as acknowledged by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Food a Drug Administration (FDA).
• Since 1986, vaccine manufacturers have been exempted from liability for any injury or death caused by vaccines. 
• Vaccine development generally takes an average of 10 years.  Experimental COVID-19 “vaccines” were fast-tracked and have not gone through full FDA approval processes. They are approved for Emergency Use only.
• It is against Federal law for EUA products to be mandated.
• As acknowledged by the CDC, it is not known whether COVID-19 “vaccines” will prevent either contracting or transmitting the illness.  The clinical trials were specifically looking at whether the “vaccines” reduced the severity of illness, but did not study whether they actually prevent contracting or transmitting the illness.
• Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 “vaccines” utilize an mRNA technology which has never been used in vaccines previously. This mRNA technology is quite different from any other vaccines previously in use, and is more akin to a gene therapy treatment than what people would normally expect a vaccine to do. In other words, these are not vaccines, which is why we are qualifying them as “vaccines”.
• The CDC acknowledges that COVID-19 “vaccines” haven’t been tested on pregnant or lactating women, people with autoimmune conditions, nor immunocompromised people.
• There are no long-term safety studies of COVID-19 “vaccines” in the general population. There are unanswered questions about whether these “vaccines” will induce pathogenic priming (which caused increased death in previous attempts to create coronavirus vaccines), placental issues, or other long-term negative health impacts.
• There is concern that administration of the “vaccine” to people who currently have COVID-19 may cause severe consequences due to the immune system attacking bodily tissues that already have COVID-19 antigens.  This is of particular concern because it is known that many people contract COVID-19 without ever showing symptoms or with only very mild symptoms. 

LATEST DATA ON NEGATIVE REACTIONS AFTER COVID19 VACCINATION:

• If you want to see a full listing and details for all 15,923 Adverse Events that have been reported for COVID-19 “vaccines”, go here: All Adverse Events Reported for COVID-19 Vaccines.
• To see a full listing and details for the 929 deaths that have been reported thus far, go here: Deaths Reported for COVID-19 Vaccines

This article has a useful synopsis of the latest data coming from the CDC Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System for COVID-19. A few pertinent quotes:
“As of Feb. 12, 15,923 adverse reactions to COVID vaccines, including 929 deaths, have been reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)…
…about one-third of those deaths occurred within 48 hours of the individual receiving the vaccination.“…the average age of the deceased was 77.8 and the youngest was 23.“According to the latest data, 3,126 “serious” adverse reactions have been reported. Adverse reaction reports from the latest CDC data also include:

• 34 miscarriages and pre-term births
• 917 anaphylactic reactions, 70% of which were reported after a Pfizer vaccine and 30% after the Moderna vaccine
• Bell’s palsy (Pfizer 75%; Moderna: 25%)

“While the VAERS database numbers may seem sobering, according to a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services study, the actual number of adverse events is likely significantly higher. VAERS is a passive surveillance system that relies on the willingness of individuals to submit reports voluntarily.”

Informed Consent is very important for these new experimental “vaccines”: Since COVID Vaccines Are Experimental, Vaccine Administrators Must Inform You of Risks.

The following list was created by the Israeli rabbi Chananya Weissman, 31 Reasons Why I Won’t Take the Vaccine:

1.		It’s not a vaccine. A vaccine by definition provides immunity to a disease. This does not provide immunity to anything. In a best-case scenario, it merely reduces the chance of getting a severe case of a virus if one catches it. Hence, it is a medical treatment, not a vaccine. I do not want to take a medical treatment for an illness I do not have.
2.		The drug companies, politicians, medical establishment, and media have joined forces to universally refer to this as a vaccine when it is not one, with the intention of manipulating people into feeling safer about undergoing a medical treatment. Because they are being deceitful, I do not trust them, and want nothing to do with their medical treatment.
3.		The presumed benefits of this medical treatment are minimal and would not last long in any case. The establishment acknowledges this, and is already talking about additional shots and ever-increasing numbers of new “vaccines” that would be required on a regular basis. I refuse to turn myself into a chronic patient who receives injections of new pharmaceutical products on a regular basis simply to reduce my chances of getting a severe case of a virus that these injections do not even prevent.
4.		I can reduce my chances of getting a severe case of a virus by strengthening my immune system naturally. In the event I catch a virus, there are vitamins and well-established drugs that have had wonderful results in warding off the illness, without the risks and unknowns of this medical treatment.
5.		The establishment insists that this medical treatment is safe. They cannot possibly know this because the long-term effects are entirely unknown, and will not be known for many years. They may speculate that it is safe, but it is disingenuous for them to make such a claim that cannot possibly be known. Because they are being disingenuous, I do not trust them, and I want no part of their treatment.
6.		The drug companies have zero liability if anything goes wrong, and cannot be sued. Same for the politicians who are pushing this treatment. I will not inject myself with a new, experimental medical device when the people behind it accept no liability or responsibility if something goes wrong. I will not risk my health and my life when they refuse to risk anything.
7.		Israel’s Prime Minister has openly admitted that the Israeli people are the world’s laboratory for this experimental treatment. I am not interested in being a guinea pig or donating my body to science.
8.		Israel agreed to share medical data of its citizens with a foreign drug company as a fundamental part of their agreement to receive this treatment. I never consented for my personal medical data to be shared with any such entity, nor was I even asked. I will not contribute to this sleazy enterprise.
9.		The executives and board members at Pfizer are on record that they have not taken their own treatment, despite all the fanfare and assurances. They are claiming that they would consider it unfair to “cut the line”. This is a preposterous excuse, and it takes an unbelievable amount of chutzpah to even say such a thing. Such a “line” is a figment of their own imagination; if they hogged a couple of injections for themselves no one would cry foul. In addition, billionaires with private jets and private islands are not known for waiting in line until hundreds of millions of peasants all over the world go first to receive anything these billionaires want for themselves.
10.		The establishment media have accepted this preposterous excuse without question or concern. Moreover, they laud Pfizer’s executives for their supposed self-sacrifice in not taking their own experimental treatment until we go first. Since they consider us such fools, I do not trust them, and do not want their new treatment. They can have my place in line. I’ll go to the very back of the line.
11.		Three facts that must be put together: Bill Gates is touting these vaccines as essential to the survival of the human race. Bill Gates believes the world has too many people and needs to be “depopulated”. Bill Gates, perhaps the richest man in the world, has also not been injected. No rush. Uh, no. I’ll pass on any medical treatments he wants me to take.
12.		The establishment has been entirely one-sided in celebrating this treatment. The politicians and media are urging people to take it as both a moral and civic duty. The benefits of the treatment are being greatly exaggerated, the risks are being ignored, and the unknowns are being brushed aside. Because they are being deceitful and manipulative, I will not gamble my personal wellbeing on their integrity.
13.		There is an intense propaganda campaign for people to take this treatment. Politicians and celebrities are taking selfies of themselves getting injected (perhaps in some cases pretending to get injected), the media is hyping this as the coolest, smartest, most happy and fun thing to do. It is the most widespread marketing campaign in history. This is not at all appropriate for any medical treatment, let alone a brand new one, and it makes me recoil.
14.		The masses are following in tow, posting pictures of themselves getting injected with a drug, feeding the mass peer pressure to do the same. There is something very alarming and sick about this, and I want no part of it. I never took drugs just because “everyone’s doing it” and it’s cool. I’m certainly not going to start now.

15.		Those who raise concerns about this medical treatment are being bullied, slandered, mocked, censored, ostracized, threatened, and fired from their jobs. This includes medical professionals who have science-based concerns about the drug and caregivers who have witnessed people under their charge suffering horrible reactions and death shortly after being injected. When the establishment is purging good people who risk everything simply to raise concerns about a new medical treatment — even if they don’t outright oppose it — I will trust these brave people over the establishment every time. I cannot think of a single similar case in history when truth and morality turned out to be on the side of the establishment.
16.		This is the greatest medical experiment in the history of the human race.
17.		It is purposely not being portrayed as the greatest medical experiment in the history of the human race, and the fact that it is a medical experiment at all is being severely downplayed.
18.		Were they up front with the masses, very few would agree to participate in such an experiment. Manipulating the masses to participate in a medical experiment under false pretenses violates the foundations of medical ethics and democratic law. I will not allow unethical people who engage in such conduct to inject me with anything.
19.		The medical establishment is not informing people about any of this. They have become marketing agents for an experimental drug, serving huge companies and politicians who have made deals with them. This is a direct conflict with their mandate to concern themselves exclusively with the wellbeing of the people under their care. Since the medical establishment has become corrupted, and has become nothing more than a corporate and political tool, I do not trust the experimental drug they want so badly to inject me with.
20.		We are being pressured in various ways to get injected, which violates medical ethics and the foundations of democratic society. The best way to get me not to do something is to pressure me to do it.
21.		The government has sealed their protocol related to the virus and treatments for THIRTY YEARS. This is information that the public has a right to know, and the government has a responsibility to share. What are they covering up? Do they really expect me to believe that everything is kosher about all this, and that they are concerned first and foremost with my health? The last time they did this was with the Yemenite Children Affair. If you’re not familiar with it, look it up. Now they’re pulling the same shtick. They didn’t fool me the first time, and they’re definitely not fooling me now.
22.		The government can share our personal medical data with foreign corporations, but they won’t share their own protocol on the matter with us? I’m out.
23.		The establishment has recruited doctors, rabbis, the media, and the masses to harangue people who don’t want to get injected with a new drug. We are being called the worst sort of names. We are being told that we believe in crazy conspiracies, that we are against science, that we are selfish, that we are murderers, that we don’t care about the elderly, that it’s our fault that the government continues to impose draconian restrictions on the public. It’s all because we don’t want to get injected with an experimental treatment, no questions asked. We are even being told that we have a religious obligation to do this, and that we are grave sinners if we do not. They say that if we do not agree to get injected, we should be forced to stay inside our homes forever and be ostracized from public life. This is horrific, disgusting, a perversion of common sense, morality, and the Torah. It makes me recoil, and only further cements my distrust of these people and my opposition to taking their experimental drug. How dare they?
24.		I know of many people who got injected, but none of them studied the science in depth, carefully weighed the potential benefits against the risks, compared this option to other alternatives, was truly informed, and decided this medical treatment was the best option for them. On the contrary, they got injected because of the hype, the propaganda, the pressure, the fear, blind trust in what “the majority of experts” supposedly believed (assuming THEY all studied everything in depth and were completely objective, which is highly dubious), blind trust in what certain influential rabbis urged them to do (ditto the above), or hysterical fear that the only option was getting injected or getting seriously ill from the virus. When I see mass hysteria and cult-like behavior surrounding a medical treatment, I will be extremely suspicious and avoid it.
25.		The drug companies have a long and glorious history of causing mass carnage with wonder drugs they thrust on unsuspecting populations, even after serious problems had already become known. Instead of pressing the pause button and halting the marketing of these drugs until these issues could be properly investigated, the drug companies did everything in their power to suppress the information and keep pushing their products. When companies and people have demonstrated such gross lack of concern for human life, I will not trust them when they hype a new wonder drug. This isn’t our first rodeo.
26.		Indeed, the horror stories are already coming in at warp speed, but the politicians are not the least bit concerned, the medical establishment is brushing them aside as unrelated or negligible, the media is ignoring it, the drug companies are steaming ahead at full speed, and those who raise a red flag continue to be bullied, censored, and punished. Clearly my life and my wellbeing are not their primary concern. I will not be their next guinea pig in their laboratory. I will not risk being the next “coincidence”.
27.		Although many people have died shortly after getting injected — including perfectly healthy young people — we are not allowed to imply that the injection had anything to do with it. Somehow this is anti-science and will cause more people to die. I believe that denying any possible link, abusing people who speculate that there might be a link, and demonstrating not the slightest curiosity to even explore if there might be a link is what is anti-science and could very well cause more people to die. These same people believe I am obligated to get injected as well. No freaking thanks.
28.		I am repulsed by the religious, cult-like worship of a pharmaceutical product, and will not participate in this ritual.
29.		My “healthcare” provider keeps badgering me to get injected, yet they have provided me no information on this treatment or any possible alternatives. Everything I know I learned from others outside the establishment. Informed consent has become conformed consent. I decline.
30.		I see all the lies, corruption, propaganda, manipulation, censorship, bullying, violation of medical ethics, lack of integrity in the scientific process, suppression of inconvenient adverse reactions, dismissal of legitimate concerns, hysteria, cult-like behavior, ignorance, closed-mindedness, fear, medical and political tyranny, concealment of protocols, lack of true concern for human life, lack of respect for basic human rights and freedoms, perversion of the Torah and common sense, demonization of good people, the greatest medical experiment of all time being conducted by greedy, untrustworthy, godless people, the lack of liability for those who demand I risk everything… I see all this and I have decided they can all have my place in line. I will put my trust in God. I will use the mind He blessed me with and trust my natural instincts. Which leads to the final reason which sums up why I will not get “vaccinated.”
31.		The whole thing stinks.

Here’s a support in navigating these questions in the context of the massive corporate, NGO and government disinfo programs used to manipulate our perceptions – by James Corbett, link to full post and show notes here. When one apprehends the scale and resources dedicated to direct our perceptions on this subject, the magnitude of the lie they’re trying to bury begins to reveal itself:

In the larger question of conventional “vaccines”, we have many resources.

From Vaccines Revealed, Truth Will Prevail, 1200 Studies, “to vaccinate or not to vaccinate”?

And here is their full Parents Playbook, 42 resources, and open the full PDF to see additional pages:

1: Vaccine Exemption Information

2: Everything You Ever Needed to Know About Medical Exemptions to Vaccination, But Didn’t Know to Ask

3: How to Claim a Medical Exemption in CA

4: Vaccination: Using the First Amendment to Opt Out of This Potentially Damaging Procedure

5: 10 Reasons MDs Should Sign Vaccine Medical Exemptions

6: School Exemption Laws by State

7: *Vaccination Liberation – Information/links and ideas regarding vaccine and religion

8: Vaccine Exemption Information

9: Protecting & Expanding State Vaccine Exemptions

10: Vaccine Laws

11: Guidance for Physicians on Medical and Immunity Exemptions in Oregon

12: What to Do When You’re Told You Can’t Get a Vaccine Exemption

13: KNOW WHO IS OR SHOULD BE EXEMPT

14: What schools and parents need to know about the new vaccination law

15: Understanding The New Vaccine Law In California

16: Vaccination Exemptions

17: Everything You Ever Needed to Know About Medical Exemptions to Vaccination, But Didn’t Know to Ask

18: States With Religious And Philosophical Exemptions From School Immunization Requirements (has requirements and exemptions per state)

19: Vaccines: The Myth of Medical Exemption

20: Frequently Asked Questions About Vaccine Exemption Information

21: Vaccination: Using the First Amendment to Opt Out of This Potentially Damaging Procedure

22: How To Get a Vaccine Religious Exemption

24: Vaccination Waiver – Adult Member Request – Sample Letter

25: LETTER OF REQUEST FOR MEDICAL EXEMPTION

26: WAIVER OF HEALTH EXAMINATION FOR SCHOOL ENTRY

27: DPH – Immunizations Exemptions Certification Forms

28: Current CDC 0-6yrs

29: Current CDC 7-Preteen

30: Current CDC – Recommendation for children with health conditions

31: Current CDC Adult-by age/health condition

32: Doctors who are vax friendly

33: Vaccine Friendly Doctors by State – Dr. Sears site

34: Vaccine Friendly Doctors by State – Dr. Sears site 2

35: California State Vaccine Requirements

36: California’s vaccine law: Opponents moving, home schooling to avoid controversial mandate

37: Immunization & Health Checkup – CalEdFacts

38: State Law & Vaccine Requirements

39: CDC – Requirements & Laws 40 Exemption Laws By State

41: State Vaccination Exemptions for Children Entering Public Schools

42: Vaccination Liberation Exemptions

(The following chart is only semi-serious and to get us thinking…)

We have loads of vaccine evidence to post here yet. In the meantime, here’s a quick Jon Rappoport rundown of some of the recent history of “flus” and vaccines, the CDC, and big pharma fraud to consider:

Why you shouldn’t believe anything the government says about vaccines and viruses

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

In this article, I’m putting together several pieces I wrote in years past, to reveal scandals on a scale most people have never considered. Why?  Because the credibility of information you’re getting now, from government agencies, about COVID, is connected to the credibility of information you’ve received from the same government agencies in years gone by. If they lied to you then—in mind-boggling ways—there is no reason to think they’re telling the truth now. Buckle up. SCANDAL ONE:  In 2013, Dr. Peter Doshi, writing in the online BMJ (British Medical Journal), revealed this monstrosity. As Doshi states, every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory samples are taken from flu patients in the US and tested in labs. Here is the kicker: only a small percentage of these samples show the presence of a flu virus. This means: most of the people in America who are diagnosed by doctors with the flu have no flu virus in their bodies. So they don’t have the flu. Therefore, even if you assume the flu vaccine is useful and safe, it couldn’t possibly prevent all those “flu cases” that aren’t flu cases. The vaccine couldn’t possibly work. The vaccine isn’t designed to prevent fake flu, unless pigs can fly. Here’s the exact quote from Peter Doshi’s BMJ review, “Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease” (BMJ 2013; 346:f3037): “…even the ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to circulating strains of wild influenza and capable of stopping all influenza viruses, can only deal with a small part of the ‘flu’ problem because most ‘flu’ appears to have nothing to do with influenza. Every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across the US. Of those tested, on average 16% are found to be influenza positive. “…It’s no wonder so many people feel that ‘flu shots’ don’t work: for most flus, they can’t.” Because most diagnosed cases of the flu aren’t the flu. So even if you’re a true believer in mainstream vaccine theory, you’re on the short end of the stick here. They’re conning your socks off. But the mainstream press can’t report any of this. It would topple the flu-treatment money machine.  It would topple public health agencies. SCANDAL TWO: Widely reported in the press, health authorities admit the seasonal flu vaccine may be only 10% effective in a given year. But of course, they urge you to take the vaccine anyway. Why is this vaccine ineffective? Because it’s made using chicken eggs, and researchers have discovered that the flu virus—which is placed in the vaccine—mutates in chicken eggs. Therefore, by the time a person takes the flu shot, he’s not being protected against this year’s seasonal flu virus. He’s being protected against a mutated virus that isn’t causing the flu this year. This is the conventional explanation. If you think it’s the whole story, I have condos for sale on the moon. You see, vaccines have been made using chicken eggs…for the past 70 years. Oops. That would mean the flu vaccine has been ineffective for decades. Healthline[dot]com: “The majority of flu vaccines are grown in chicken eggs, a method of vaccine development that’s been used for 70 years.” SCANDAL THREE: In December of 2005, the British Medical Journal (online) published another shocking Peter Doshi report, which created tremors through the halls of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), where “the experts” used to tell the press that 36,000 people in the US die every year from the flu. Here is a quote from Doshi’s report, “Are US flu death figures more PR than science?” (BMJ 2005; 331:1412): “[According to CDC statistics], ‘influenza and pneumonia’ took 62,034 lives in 2001—61,777 of which were attributable to pneumonia and 257 to flu, and in only 18 cases was the flu virus positively identified.” Boom. You see, the CDC created one overall category that combines both flu and pneumonia deaths. Why do they do this? Because they disingenuously assume that the pneumonia deaths are complications stemming from the flu. This is an absurd assumption. Pneumonia has a number of causes. But even worse, in all the flu and pneumonia deaths, only 18 revealed the presence of an influenza virus. Therefore, the CDC could not say, with assurance, that more than 18 people died of influenza in 2001. Not 36,000 deaths. 18 deaths. Doshi continued his assessment of published CDC flu-death statistics: “Between 1979 and 2001, [CDC] data show an average of 1348 [flu] deaths per year (range 257 to 3006).” These figures refer to flu separated out from pneumonia. This death toll is obviously far lower than the old parroted 36,000 figure. However, when you add the sensible condition that lab tests have to actually find the flu virus in patients, the numbers of flu deaths plummet even further. In other words, it’s all promotion and hype. “Well, uh, we used to say that 36,000 people die from the flu every year in the US. But actually, all we can prove is about 20 deaths. However, we can’t admit that, because if we did, we’d be exposing our gigantic psyop. The whole campaign to scare people into getting a flu shot would have about the same effect as warning people to carry iron umbrellas, in case toasters fall out of upper-story windows…and, by the way, we’d be put in prison for fraud.” SCANDAL FOUR: The so-called Swine Flu pandemic of 2009. This one is a real eye-opener. The CDC was caught with its pants down. Swine Flu was hyped to the sky by the CDC. The Agency was calling for all Americans to take the Swine Flu vaccine. Remember? The problem was, the CDC was concealing a very dirty secret. At the time, star CBS investigative reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, was working on the Swine Flu story. She discovered that the CDC had secretly stopped counting cases of the illness—while, of course, continuing to warn Americans about its unchecked spread. Understand that the CDC’s main job is counting cases and reporting the numbers. What was the Agency up to? Here is an excerpt from my 2014 interview with Sharyl Attkisson: Rappoport: In 2009, you spearheaded coverage of the so-called Swine Flu pandemic. You discovered that, in the summer of 2009, the Centers for Disease Control, ignoring their federal mandate, [secretly] stopped counting Swine Flu cases in America. Yet they continued to stir up fear about the “pandemic,” without having any real measure of its impact. Wasn’t that another investigation of yours that was shut down? Wasn’t there more to find out? Attkisson: The implications of the story were even worse than that. We discovered through our FOI efforts that before the CDC mysteriously stopped counting Swine Flu cases, they had learned that almost none of the cases they had counted as Swine Flu was, in fact, Swine Flu or any sort of flu at all! The interest in the story from one [CBS] executive was very enthusiastic. He said it was “the most original story” he’d seen on the whole Swine Flu epidemic. But others pushed to stop it [after it was published on the CBS News website] and, in the end, no [CBS television news] broadcast wanted to touch it. We aired numerous stories pumping up the idea of an epidemic, but not the one that would shed original, new light on all the hype. It was fair, accurate, legally approved and a heck of a story. With the CDC keeping the true Swine Flu stats secret, it meant that many in the public took and gave their children an experimental vaccine that may not have been necessary. —end of interview excerpt— It was routine for doctors all over America to send blood samples from patients they’d diagnosed with Swine Flu, or the “most likely” Swine Flu patients, to labs for testing. And overwhelmingly, those samples were coming back with the result: not Swine Flu, not any kind of flu. That was the big secret. That’s what the CDC was hiding. That’s why they stopped reporting Swine Flu case numbers. That’s what Attkisson had discovered. That’s why she was shut down. But it gets even worse. Because about three weeks after Attkisson’s findings were published on the CBS News website, the CDC, obviously in a panic, decided to double down. If one lie is exposed, tell an even bigger one. A much bigger one. Here, from a November 12, 2009, WebMD article is the CDC’s response: “Shockingly, 14 million to 34 million U.S. residents – the CDC’s best guess is 22 million – came down with H1N1 swine flu by Oct. 17 [2009].” (“22 million cases of Swine Flu in US,” by Daniel J. DeNoon). Are your eyeballs popping? They should be. In the summer of 2009, the CDC secretly stops counting Swine Flu cases in America, because the overwhelming percentage of lab tests from likely Swine Flu patients shows no sign of Swine Flu or any other kind of flu. There is no Swine Flu epidemic. Then, the CDC estimates there are 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu in the US. SCANDAL FIVE:  This one involves a vaccine manufacturer.  It goes back to at least 2016, and it keeps unfolding. —The Philippines, where drug giant Sanofi’s Dengvaxia, was given to prevent Dengue Fever.  Sanofi is facing enormous pushback from government officials, who stopped the national vaccination campaign, after thousands of children already received the shot. The issue? Safety. FiercePharma: “The Philippines stopped vaccinations shortly after the company warned that Dengvaxia can cause more serious infections in those who previously hadn’t had exposure to the virus. The country also kicked off a probe and plans legal action, according to health secretary Francisco Duque.” Did you get that? The company (Sanofi) itself warned that vaccine might not be safe. FiercePharma: “…the [Philippine] Department of Health didn’t heed warnings from an advisory group of doctors and pharmacologists, who concluded early last year that the vaccine’s safety and efficacy were unproven.” My, my. But let’s dig even deeper. Sanofi saying is saying the vaccine might be dangerous for those who haven’t been exposed to the Dengue virus before getting the shot. What on Earth does that mean? It means a child who had naturally come in contact with the virus would have developed his own antibodies to it. And later, those antibodies would protect him against the Dengue virus IN THE VACCINE. Otherwise, the virus in the vaccine could give him a case of Dengue or cause some other form of damage. This is saying, “If a child is ALREADY immune to Dengue Fever, because his immune system has successfully dealt with the virus, then the vaccine won’t damage him.” And THAT is saying, “If the child has naturally developed an immunity to Dengue, then the vaccine, WHICH HE DOESN’T NEED, won’t harm him.” Of course, the press isn’t getting the picture. If any reporters are seeing the light, they’re keeping their mouths shut. The scandal is too big and too crazy. Between the lines, a vaccine company is admitting their vaccine is only safe for children who don’t need it. A tree just fell in the forest. Who heard it? Mainstream reporters don’t want to uncover the true meaning of vaccine scandals. Therefore, they cultivate ignorance as a defense against admitting their own unconscionable bias. And that’s the essence of their own mental “vaccine,” which works very well. For them. These five scandals, as boggling as they are, are just a brief sampling from the recent history of governments and pharma. History matters. The titanic load of nonsense and lies about COVID now being dropped on the population is one more chapter of business as usual: In 2019, a new and unique coronavirus was discovered through the application of proper scientific procedures.  LIE. The diagnostic test (PCR) is dependable and highly accurate.  LIE. The case numbers and deaths numbers are accurate and meaningful.  LIE. The containment measures are effective.  LIE. The destruction of national economies, through lockdowns, is necessary.  LIE. In over 150 articles, I’ve provided evidence to support the assertion that these are all egregious lies.